Grazing Plan

written by

Joel Salatin

posted on

March 4, 2025

With the change in weather this week, we feel spring in the air.  

What a welcome change and relief from the unusually cold winter we've enjoyed.  

The cows are still eating hay; the fields are still winter-frozen brown; the chickens and pigs are still in hoophouses. But you can feel the change in the air. 

And going outside without a coat is always welcome.

With grass green-up a mere few days away, I've been doing one of my late winter chores: creating a 2025-26 grazing plan.  

With nearly 1,000 head of cattle and a dozen properties, putting the right number at the right place for the right period of time and moving them all every day is quite a logistical puzzle.

How do we know how many to put on a place, when to stock and when to destock on the various properties, and how to schedule all these moving parts?  

Like any huge project, it's like eating an elephant: one bite at a time.

The first thing is to write down the various properties and their available pasture acreages:

HT:  70   

GG:  125                  

BM:  240                  

SU:  40                 

and on and on.

Each of these properties has a different fertility level, which means the acreages vary, sometimes significantly, in the amount of grass they can grow. Just like some parts of your lawn grow thicker grass than others, some acreages grow more forage than others.  

Because we know the history of each one, we know which ones are more productive and which ones less so.

The key to everything is a standard measure. 

Allocation of animals is based on a way to measure forage production. That standard is the cow-day.  Carpenters use inches.  Electricians use volts, watts, and amps.  Bankers use dollars.  

The point is every vocation needs some kind of measurement standard. For us, it's a cow-day: the amount of grass one cow equivalent will eat in one day.  Obviously a baby calf is not a "cow equivalent".  A just-weaned calf (called a stocker) is about half of one "cow equivalent".

The whole herd is divided into roughly four groups:  mama cows (and their calves once they start calving at the end of March), stockers (year-old calves), finishers (two-year-old calves approaching processing), and the hodge-podge (a mixture of final finishers, called fats, bred heifers, and perhaps some struggling calves that need some extra care). This last group is always kept at Polyface central--the farm hub.

Each herd is then assigned a cow equivalent number.  For example, 300 stockers would be 150 cow equivalents while 300 finishers would be 230 cow equivalents.  

Now we have a standard measure of the group that we can match with the cow-day production of the various pastures.  

Lots of nuances enter into the plan.  

For example, grass doesn't grow consistently throughout the season.  It starts slow, then speeds up, then might slow down if it gets hot and dry, then speeds up again if we get rain in the fall before things get too cold.

By keeping records from year to year, we have a historical production record, or average, that we can use to guide us in this year's plan.  

For example, if property HT yielded 150 cow-days a year on average, we can be pretty sure that by the first of May it'll offer 50 cow-days, then by August first another 50, then another 50 at the end of the season or even into the winter. That's like three mowings in the season.

So if we have a 150-cow-equivalent herd and HT has 50 cow-days on 70 acres, that's a total of 3,500 cow-days divided by 150 is roughly 23 days we can feed that herd at that location at that time of year.  

Yes, it's a lot--a lot--of math.  

But the formula is the same across all properties; the mastery is in knowing a ballpark cow-day forage volume at a certain time of year and plugging the right herd into that spot.

Lest anyone think this is normal planning for cattle, it's not.  

Probably in the U.S., not 2 in 100 cattle farmers do this, think about it, or know how to do it.  They just have their herd in a pasture for the year very little real planning or management.  

At Polyface, this level of management is the key to mimicking the migrational choreography of the wild herds that traversed North America 500 years ago and bequeathed to us the rich alpha soils modern chemical and grain-based agriculture is still mining.

We don't have the wolves and fires of yesteryear to move the herds around; what we have is electric fence and water lines:  those are the steering wheel, brake, and accelerator on the 4-legged forage pruners.  

By moving them around, we can let the grass rest and regrow between prunings, enabling it to get stronger, healthier, and thicker.  

This marries today's high tech control and water infrastructure with ancient wild patterns.

The reason Polyface beef tastes and handles beautifully is because this management stimulates lush forages and lots of plant diversity: hence our term, SALAD BAR BEEF.  

It's as close to antiquity's ecology and nutrition as you can get with today's domestic livestock.

What's on your plate starts in late winter, with vestiges of the last snow melting in the road ditches, with a calculator, lots of paper, figuring, and head scratching to get all the animals at the right place at the right time throughout the year.  

While I'm poring over these formulas and figures, I'm thinking about the cook-outs and family dinner tables that will enjoy this labor of love.  

Thank you for partnering with us in this great land healing and nutrition-satisfying endeavor.  You know you're always welcome to visit our--your--cows.

Joel

More from the blog

Duplication

  "How does this scale?"  Whenever someone asks me that question, the underlying assumption is that production volume requires consolidation, concentration, and centralization.           In other words, the only way to feed the world is to make bigger chicken houses in one place, bigger canneries in one place, bigger machines and bigger warehouses.  I remember well being vilified by a Smithsonian historian at a food conference where he and I were both on a panel.                     When I dared to suggest bigger is not always better, he interrupted me and ranted for 10 minutes on why bigger is always better.  "A bigger fort was always bigger than a smaller one.  A bigger gun was always better than a smaller one."  He went on and on about how historical accuracy and authenticity demands addiction to bigger.                   But biology is not forts and guns.  It's not mechanical.  Critters have an optimal size.  As animal behaviorist guru Temple Grandin says, living things demand energy for three things:  reproduction, growth, and immunological function.  All three must be in balance.  When anyone selects for only one of those traits, the other two suffer.  That's why American dairy cows only have two lactations on average.  When they milk as heavily as our one-trait genetic selection asks, they don't breed and have all sorts of sickness problems.                   Nature does not scale through concentration; it scales with duplication.  If nature wants more oak, it doesn't make one big tree; it makes acorns.  If nature wants more milk, it doesn't make a great big cow; it makes calves.  If nature wants more tomatoes, it doesn't make a monster tomato plant; it makes a bunch of seeds that make more tomato plants.  Nature scales with duplication.                   At Polyface, rather than having a chicken house big enough for 15,000 chickens, we have 170 little 120 square foot portable shelters holding 75 birds apiece and giving us cumulative capacity for 15,000.  But they're spread out in modules, duplicated, to give us the production volume.                   We run pigs in groupings of 35-50.  A Smithfield confinement facility might house 5,000 hogs in a bigger-than-football-field-sized facility.  The stench is unbearable.  By spreading these pigs out across the landscape in small groups we get the same scale without any of the ecological, immunological, or animal welfare dysfunction.                   This could even be said of farming in general.  People see the massive corn, soybean, and alfalfa farms in the mid-west and wonder how we would possibly survive without those massive, single-species outfits.  The fact is they aren't even producing food.  Half the soybeans are exported to other countries; those markets are drying up rapidly with competition from other countries like Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil.  Nearly half the corn goes to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol.  The alfalfa goes to Japan and Saudi Arabia to feed racehorses.  By and large, all that production isn't even food.                   The fact is we don't need to produce all those commodities and even if we needed it all for food, we could do it in a more spread out, diversified platform.  America has 35 million acres in lawns.  We have 36 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses.  All of this could be turned into duplicative production, like acorns for oak trees.                   My point is this:  scale as commonly understood in modern American lexicon is completely anti-ecological.  The real mechanism for scale is duplication.  A more democratized production creating volume through multiplicative nodes is the way nature works.  This is why farms like Polyface, with spread out infrastructure in repeated modules offers multiple advantages.                   Polyface can't feed the world by itself, and we have no desire to build an empire trying to.  But thousands of Polyfaces can feed the world.  Indeed, they're the only way to do it for the next 500 years.  This is one reason why we invest heavily in germinating new young farmers. Our stewardship and apprenticeship programs are all about this kind of duplication.                   In fact, Aug. 21-22 we're hosting the Stockman Grass Farmer's Launching Young Farmers conference where we'll feature 8 of our graduates who were 20 years old, no money, no land, and at 40 are full-time farming without government subsidies.  If you ever dreamed of bootstrapping a farming career, you should come.  We still have room.  It will be the most profound agricultural conference in America this year.  Information is on our website on the education tab.                   For most of you, the fact that you keep us in business to duplicate production and the farmers who will carry these principles forward, indicates your heart investing in an authentic food and farming model.  Thank you for making it all possible.