Making the most of what there’s most of

written by

Susan Blasko

posted on

January 20, 2026

Every year, there are certain crops that do extremely well, while others falter or fail. 

Several years ago, the pear tree in my front yard produced more pears than I thought the tree could possibly hold — thirty-four heaping five-gallon buckets of Bartlet pears. I couldn’t keep up with picking them off the ground as they fell from the branches every day. It went on relentlessly for weeks.

This is on my mind at this moment because just the other day I used my last quart of home-canned pears from that year. 

Memories flooded back to me, memories of processing the pears, memories of my father helping me with many repetitive motions involved with preserving them in every way.

We canned them, juiced them, dehydrated them, cooked and mashed them into pear sauce, and fermented them into pear cider vinegar (a labor of love).

A year or so before the profuse-pear-year, my neighbor gifted me with a bushel of apples she picked from a relative’s orchard. That particular year, apples had been very prolific. Something had to be done!

I’d always wanted to try making raw apple cider vinegar, so I saw this as an opportunity. 

I chopped them, filled several vats, added water, sugar, and yeast, covered them with cheesecloth, and waited for time and temperature to do the rest. The concoction proceeded through the various stages from cider to bubbly champagne to wine, and finally, raw apple cider vinegar.

I supposed that putting the pears through the same process would result in pear cider vinegar.

I’d never heard of pear cider vinegar, but my understanding of the science behind the process was that it should yield a similar product. I was in the mood to experiment.

I repeated the procedure for apple cider vinegar, substituting pears for apples. In addition to whole pears cut into pieces, I also used the peels and cores of the pears that had been canned and mashed into sauce. 

The results were outstanding. I decanted some liquid at each phase so that I could store bottles of each: cider, champagne, wine, and vinegar. Since I didn’t add anything to stop the fermentation, it all slowly advanced to the vinegar stage. No harm done.

Since that first batch nine years ago, I haven’t needed to buy vinegar at the supermarket. The pear tree yields enough fruit each year to replenish my supply. 

If there’s a late frost, there will be no pears that year, but there’s enough vinegar from prior years to last until the tree bears fruit again. 

I use my pear vinegar on salads, in marinades, in cleaners and solutions to wash fruits and vegetables, and to sanitize food containers. I also use it to soak bones prior to making bone broth.

We are blessed with an overabundance of certain crops. Every crop takes its turn at showing off. One year, it’s tomatoes. Another year, it’s green beans. When it’s apples or pears, making vinegar is a way to make the most of what there’s most of!

Susan

susan

clean living

lifestyle

More from the blog

Duplication

  "How does this scale?"  Whenever someone asks me that question, the underlying assumption is that production volume requires consolidation, concentration, and centralization.           In other words, the only way to feed the world is to make bigger chicken houses in one place, bigger canneries in one place, bigger machines and bigger warehouses.  I remember well being vilified by a Smithsonian historian at a food conference where he and I were both on a panel.                     When I dared to suggest bigger is not always better, he interrupted me and ranted for 10 minutes on why bigger is always better.  "A bigger fort was always bigger than a smaller one.  A bigger gun was always better than a smaller one."  He went on and on about how historical accuracy and authenticity demands addiction to bigger.                   But biology is not forts and guns.  It's not mechanical.  Critters have an optimal size.  As animal behaviorist guru Temple Grandin says, living things demand energy for three things:  reproduction, growth, and immunological function.  All three must be in balance.  When anyone selects for only one of those traits, the other two suffer.  That's why American dairy cows only have two lactations on average.  When they milk as heavily as our one-trait genetic selection asks, they don't breed and have all sorts of sickness problems.                   Nature does not scale through concentration; it scales with duplication.  If nature wants more oak, it doesn't make one big tree; it makes acorns.  If nature wants more milk, it doesn't make a great big cow; it makes calves.  If nature wants more tomatoes, it doesn't make a monster tomato plant; it makes a bunch of seeds that make more tomato plants.  Nature scales with duplication.                   At Polyface, rather than having a chicken house big enough for 15,000 chickens, we have 170 little 120 square foot portable shelters holding 75 birds apiece and giving us cumulative capacity for 15,000.  But they're spread out in modules, duplicated, to give us the production volume.                   We run pigs in groupings of 35-50.  A Smithfield confinement facility might house 5,000 hogs in a bigger-than-football-field-sized facility.  The stench is unbearable.  By spreading these pigs out across the landscape in small groups we get the same scale without any of the ecological, immunological, or animal welfare dysfunction.                   This could even be said of farming in general.  People see the massive corn, soybean, and alfalfa farms in the mid-west and wonder how we would possibly survive without those massive, single-species outfits.  The fact is they aren't even producing food.  Half the soybeans are exported to other countries; those markets are drying up rapidly with competition from other countries like Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil.  Nearly half the corn goes to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol.  The alfalfa goes to Japan and Saudi Arabia to feed racehorses.  By and large, all that production isn't even food.                   The fact is we don't need to produce all those commodities and even if we needed it all for food, we could do it in a more spread out, diversified platform.  America has 35 million acres in lawns.  We have 36 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses.  All of this could be turned into duplicative production, like acorns for oak trees.                   My point is this:  scale as commonly understood in modern American lexicon is completely anti-ecological.  The real mechanism for scale is duplication.  A more democratized production creating volume through multiplicative nodes is the way nature works.  This is why farms like Polyface, with spread out infrastructure in repeated modules offers multiple advantages.                   Polyface can't feed the world by itself, and we have no desire to build an empire trying to.  But thousands of Polyfaces can feed the world.  Indeed, they're the only way to do it for the next 500 years.  This is one reason why we invest heavily in germinating new young farmers. Our stewardship and apprenticeship programs are all about this kind of duplication.                   In fact, Aug. 21-22 we're hosting the Stockman Grass Farmer's Launching Young Farmers conference where we'll feature 8 of our graduates who were 20 years old, no money, no land, and at 40 are full-time farming without government subsidies.  If you ever dreamed of bootstrapping a farming career, you should come.  We still have room.  It will be the most profound agricultural conference in America this year.  Information is on our website on the education tab.                   For most of you, the fact that you keep us in business to duplicate production and the farmers who will carry these principles forward, indicates your heart investing in an authentic food and farming model.  Thank you for making it all possible.