Harvest

written by

Melissa Barth

posted on

June 25, 2024

The weather here in the Valley has been pretty warm as of late; but with warmer weather comes harvesting. 

What is your favorite vegetable to harvest? 

Lately, I have been getting a fair amount of broccoli and zucchini. While I don't mind harvesting broccoli, lettuce and zucchini are more fun.

Something about those bright green, luscious leaves (and maybe the fact that I love salads) makes harvesting lettuce a very pleasant task. 

And zucchini? Well, it's just pure potential. With one simple twist, loaves of zucchini bread, cheesy zucchini casseroles, or crispy zucchini rounds are all a possibility. And time fails for all the other wonderful things you can do with this versatile vegetable (zucchini brownies, anyone?). Personally, I don't mind it in scrambled eggs either! 

Something that has impressed me this first growing season at Polyface is just how quickly our vegetables have matured. It seems like overnight my zucchini plants took off and developed fruit. The same goes for broccoli, carrots, cucumbers, and cilantro. 

Harvest-Post.jpg

While in the beginning stages of their life plants and seeds usually need more attention, I have found that just before a harvest they are quite self-sufficient. 

I think this relates well to life. 

Have you been caught by surprise with the fruit of your choices? Are the actions you have taken over the course of months and even years finally bearing a harvest? 

Personally, I wish only the good things would bear fruit in my life. But often I am surprised by the not-so-pleasant things that I reap (only to recall that my priorities and actions did not align with my desired path). 

On the other hand, how delightful it is when you see the good return of things you have sown and cultivated in the past. Sometimes those things take us by surprise!! The neighbor you have consistently said "hi" to every morning (with no response on their part) is now engaging in a conversation. That debt you have been chipping away at by saying "no" to non-essential items and luxuries is finally about to be paid off. The land you have been faithfully stewarding is now ready to support more animals. Maybe it is a win in the home, garden, gym, workplace, or church but you are seeing your efforts being rewarded with good fruit. 

I hope that, as we head into the heat of summer, your personal, relational, and vocational harvests will delightfully surprise you!  

- Melissa

Harvest-Post-3.jpg

More from the blog

Duplication

  "How does this scale?"  Whenever someone asks me that question, the underlying assumption is that production volume requires consolidation, concentration, and centralization.           In other words, the only way to feed the world is to make bigger chicken houses in one place, bigger canneries in one place, bigger machines and bigger warehouses.  I remember well being vilified by a Smithsonian historian at a food conference where he and I were both on a panel.                     When I dared to suggest bigger is not always better, he interrupted me and ranted for 10 minutes on why bigger is always better.  "A bigger fort was always bigger than a smaller one.  A bigger gun was always better than a smaller one."  He went on and on about how historical accuracy and authenticity demands addiction to bigger.                   But biology is not forts and guns.  It's not mechanical.  Critters have an optimal size.  As animal behaviorist guru Temple Grandin says, living things demand energy for three things:  reproduction, growth, and immunological function.  All three must be in balance.  When anyone selects for only one of those traits, the other two suffer.  That's why American dairy cows only have two lactations on average.  When they milk as heavily as our one-trait genetic selection asks, they don't breed and have all sorts of sickness problems.                   Nature does not scale through concentration; it scales with duplication.  If nature wants more oak, it doesn't make one big tree; it makes acorns.  If nature wants more milk, it doesn't make a great big cow; it makes calves.  If nature wants more tomatoes, it doesn't make a monster tomato plant; it makes a bunch of seeds that make more tomato plants.  Nature scales with duplication.                   At Polyface, rather than having a chicken house big enough for 15,000 chickens, we have 170 little 120 square foot portable shelters holding 75 birds apiece and giving us cumulative capacity for 15,000.  But they're spread out in modules, duplicated, to give us the production volume.                   We run pigs in groupings of 35-50.  A Smithfield confinement facility might house 5,000 hogs in a bigger-than-football-field-sized facility.  The stench is unbearable.  By spreading these pigs out across the landscape in small groups we get the same scale without any of the ecological, immunological, or animal welfare dysfunction.                   This could even be said of farming in general.  People see the massive corn, soybean, and alfalfa farms in the mid-west and wonder how we would possibly survive without those massive, single-species outfits.  The fact is they aren't even producing food.  Half the soybeans are exported to other countries; those markets are drying up rapidly with competition from other countries like Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil.  Nearly half the corn goes to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol.  The alfalfa goes to Japan and Saudi Arabia to feed racehorses.  By and large, all that production isn't even food.                   The fact is we don't need to produce all those commodities and even if we needed it all for food, we could do it in a more spread out, diversified platform.  America has 35 million acres in lawns.  We have 36 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses.  All of this could be turned into duplicative production, like acorns for oak trees.                   My point is this:  scale as commonly understood in modern American lexicon is completely anti-ecological.  The real mechanism for scale is duplication.  A more democratized production creating volume through multiplicative nodes is the way nature works.  This is why farms like Polyface, with spread out infrastructure in repeated modules offers multiple advantages.                   Polyface can't feed the world by itself, and we have no desire to build an empire trying to.  But thousands of Polyfaces can feed the world.  Indeed, they're the only way to do it for the next 500 years.  This is one reason why we invest heavily in germinating new young farmers. Our stewardship and apprenticeship programs are all about this kind of duplication.                   In fact, Aug. 21-22 we're hosting the Stockman Grass Farmer's Launching Young Farmers conference where we'll feature 8 of our graduates who were 20 years old, no money, no land, and at 40 are full-time farming without government subsidies.  If you ever dreamed of bootstrapping a farming career, you should come.  We still have room.  It will be the most profound agricultural conference in America this year.  Information is on our website on the education tab.                   For most of you, the fact that you keep us in business to duplicate production and the farmers who will carry these principles forward, indicates your heart investing in an authentic food and farming model.  Thank you for making it all possible.