Surface Runoff

written by

Joel Salatin

posted on

May 6, 2025

The most unknown and underappreciated infrastructure at "Polyface Central" (what we call the home farm as opposed to nearby rental properties) is the 12 miles of buried 1 1/4 inch water line along the edges of our fields.

At today's prices, just the polyethylene pipe is $50,000 in value, not counting installation labor and pond construction.  

Ponds?  In many parts of the U.S., ponds are prohibited because they're deemed "hoarding" water.  If I inventory water on my property, it deprives others of that water, some say.

I'd like to explore that mentality with all of you, our loyal patrons, and share our convictions. You can decide which approach is most helpful for our neighbors, our ecology, and our Earth.

Many environmentalists have taken this position and lobbied state governments to criminalize pond building.  

To my knowledge, the worst two states are Colorado, which even bans rain barrels, and California, which prohibits digging anything bigger than a bathtub.

Landscape water, or what I'd call nature's hydrologic inventory, comes in many forms:  underground aquifers, waterways (creeks, streams, rivers), and natural springs.  

These are all part of the commons,  enjoying shared ownership since no single person or land manager put them there.  These commons sources originate somewhere, traverse a property, and then exit to somewhere else.

Furthermore, these commons are finite.  An aquifer holds only so much water in sand pits and caverns underground.  

Wells punch into this inventory and suck water out.  

Springs only generate a certain amount of flow.  Ditto for rivers and streams.  

You can measure the flow of a river.  

In all of these, if enough people suck water out, they cease to exist.  

One of the biggest river systems in the world is the Murray-Darling in southern Australia; in the 1800s, ocean-going steamships sailed 500 miles inland on this magnificent river.  Today, it doesn't even make it to the ocean because farmers and cities draw from it along its course and finally eliminate it.

In the 1930s, an Australian mining engineer named P.A. Yeomans, looking at the dry Australian landscape, took a revolutionary view.  He dared to think of surface runoff as completely different than the commons.  

His thinking greatly impacted Bill Mollison and David Holmgren, fellow Australians, who in the late 1960s developed Permaculture.  

American novelist and farmer Louis Bromfield at his Ohio Malabar Farm copied this thinking by building a series of small ponds that he admonished other farmers to duplicate to eliminate flooding on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers.

That's a tall order, to be sure, but here is the rationale.  

Roughly one-third of all raindrops arrive either too fast or too much (or both) to be absorbed by the soil.  This is a global reality regardless of climate.  In a given year, the average landscape, whether used for agriculture or wasteland, absorbs two-thirds of its rainfall.  The other one-third becomes surface runoff; in many cases, this generates a flood.

The point is that those one-third of raindrops do not benefit where they land and don't benefit where they go.  They can become catastrophic if too many join together downstream.  Every flood is an accumulation of surface runoff.

By categorizing surface runoff differently than commons water, we can devise a response plan to minimize the devastation caused by those escaping and cascading raindrops.  The answer is ponds to catch surface runoff.  At Polyface, we've built more than 20 ponds for precisely this service.  These don't impede creeks and rivers; they simply hold surface runoff.

A bone-dry valley in July might collect enough surface runoff from a snow melt in January to fill a 3-inch pipe for several days.  That's a lot of water.  

One valley flowing into another into another and collecting into a stream, eventuates into a destructive torrent.  

To get an idea of how much water we're talking about, in our Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, we receive 30 inches of rainfall a year.  One-third of that is 10 inches.

One acre-inch (one inch covering one acre, which is roughly a football field without the end zones) is 30,000 gallons; 10 inches is 300,000 gallons.  That means each acre we own at Polyface Central generates about 300,000 gallons of surface runoff water per year.  

We own nearly 1,000 acres, which translates to 300,000,000 gallons.  That's just our farm.  Add the neighbors, and you can see these numbers become astronomical.

Pre-European, North America was roughly 8 percent water due to beaver dams (ponds).  Today, we're below 4 percent water.  All those dams created protections from flooding.  They served multiple purposes: reducing volume and velocity in a flood, catching silt from any soil being washed away; wildlife nesting and watering availability; evapotranspiration encouragement for healthy cloud formation, and overall hydrologic function.

One of the core Permaculture principles is that every raindrop should stay as close to where it falls for as long as possible.  Slowing down gravitational raindrop flow is an overarching goal of redemptive landscape design.  

This is one area where human ingenuity and mechanical prowess can massage the landscape into far better function than original landforms.  

A "no touch" policy that exists in too many areas, like wilderness areas and other government-owned land, is not a recipe for ecological enhancement.  The beavers aren't coming back 200 million strong.

But with strategic excavation and judicious design, we can build hydrologic redemption into the landscape, hydrating it for dry times and protecting downstream neighbors from catastrophic flooding.  

Yeomans challenged farmers with two notions: eliminate surface runoff and never end a drought with a full pond.  In other words, catch those escaping raindrops and then apply them to parched soil during dry times.

Writing and designing before the advent of cheap polyethylene pipe, his systems all depended on off-contour ditches, or swales, to duct the water from the pond out to farm fields.  

I had the privilege of visiting one of his farms in Australia about 25 years ago, and the genius was clear to see.  

Today, with pipe and extremely efficient pumps, we can move water uphill without excavating gentle ditches.  The concept is the same and the benefits identical. Yeomans' book Water for Every Farm is still the go-to classic in innovative thinking about water on farms.

Imagine if this concept were implemented on the nation's interstate system.  Instead of cutting ridges and filling valleys, placing culverts in the bottom to drain water away, each of those valley fills could be a pond dam.  Moving the culvert to the top of the fill still offers drainage, but with the same amount of earth moving, you get a pond for your effort instead of a dry valley.  

All along the interstate, ponds would offer flyways for birds, flood control for the landscape, and irrigation options for farmland.  That's called redemptive land care.

At Polyface, we've been investing in ponds for decades and intend to continue doing so until we reach that magnificent beaver number:  8 percent.  We're not even at 1 percent yet, so we have a few lifetimes to go.  

Thank you for taking the journey with us. Your participation in our land mission enables our healing hands to caress the landscape.  

Joel

More from the blog

Duplication

  "How does this scale?"  Whenever someone asks me that question, the underlying assumption is that production volume requires consolidation, concentration, and centralization.           In other words, the only way to feed the world is to make bigger chicken houses in one place, bigger canneries in one place, bigger machines and bigger warehouses.  I remember well being vilified by a Smithsonian historian at a food conference where he and I were both on a panel.                     When I dared to suggest bigger is not always better, he interrupted me and ranted for 10 minutes on why bigger is always better.  "A bigger fort was always bigger than a smaller one.  A bigger gun was always better than a smaller one."  He went on and on about how historical accuracy and authenticity demands addiction to bigger.                   But biology is not forts and guns.  It's not mechanical.  Critters have an optimal size.  As animal behaviorist guru Temple Grandin says, living things demand energy for three things:  reproduction, growth, and immunological function.  All three must be in balance.  When anyone selects for only one of those traits, the other two suffer.  That's why American dairy cows only have two lactations on average.  When they milk as heavily as our one-trait genetic selection asks, they don't breed and have all sorts of sickness problems.                   Nature does not scale through concentration; it scales with duplication.  If nature wants more oak, it doesn't make one big tree; it makes acorns.  If nature wants more milk, it doesn't make a great big cow; it makes calves.  If nature wants more tomatoes, it doesn't make a monster tomato plant; it makes a bunch of seeds that make more tomato plants.  Nature scales with duplication.                   At Polyface, rather than having a chicken house big enough for 15,000 chickens, we have 170 little 120 square foot portable shelters holding 75 birds apiece and giving us cumulative capacity for 15,000.  But they're spread out in modules, duplicated, to give us the production volume.                   We run pigs in groupings of 35-50.  A Smithfield confinement facility might house 5,000 hogs in a bigger-than-football-field-sized facility.  The stench is unbearable.  By spreading these pigs out across the landscape in small groups we get the same scale without any of the ecological, immunological, or animal welfare dysfunction.                   This could even be said of farming in general.  People see the massive corn, soybean, and alfalfa farms in the mid-west and wonder how we would possibly survive without those massive, single-species outfits.  The fact is they aren't even producing food.  Half the soybeans are exported to other countries; those markets are drying up rapidly with competition from other countries like Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil.  Nearly half the corn goes to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol.  The alfalfa goes to Japan and Saudi Arabia to feed racehorses.  By and large, all that production isn't even food.                   The fact is we don't need to produce all those commodities and even if we needed it all for food, we could do it in a more spread out, diversified platform.  America has 35 million acres in lawns.  We have 36 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses.  All of this could be turned into duplicative production, like acorns for oak trees.                   My point is this:  scale as commonly understood in modern American lexicon is completely anti-ecological.  The real mechanism for scale is duplication.  A more democratized production creating volume through multiplicative nodes is the way nature works.  This is why farms like Polyface, with spread out infrastructure in repeated modules offers multiple advantages.                   Polyface can't feed the world by itself, and we have no desire to build an empire trying to.  But thousands of Polyfaces can feed the world.  Indeed, they're the only way to do it for the next 500 years.  This is one reason why we invest heavily in germinating new young farmers. Our stewardship and apprenticeship programs are all about this kind of duplication.                   In fact, Aug. 21-22 we're hosting the Stockman Grass Farmer's Launching Young Farmers conference where we'll feature 8 of our graduates who were 20 years old, no money, no land, and at 40 are full-time farming without government subsidies.  If you ever dreamed of bootstrapping a farming career, you should come.  We still have room.  It will be the most profound agricultural conference in America this year.  Information is on our website on the education tab.                   For most of you, the fact that you keep us in business to duplicate production and the farmers who will carry these principles forward, indicates your heart investing in an authentic food and farming model.  Thank you for making it all possible.