What Really Makes You Fat?

written by

Susan Blasko

posted on

January 28, 2025

Many who struggle with excess weight try to lose weight by limiting their fat intake, thinking that consuming fat is what makes them fat. 

But as they soon discover, it’s not that simple.

Excess fat storage in the body is primarily the result of consuming excess carbohydrates and proteins. This is another way of saying it’s a result of not consuming enough fats. 

Why?

Because excess carbs and proteins are converted into fat. 

The best way to prevent conversion in your own body is to adjust your intake of these three macronutrients - fats, carbohydrates, and proteins. You need all of them, and they need to be in balanced proportions.

We are all unique individuals. However, some general principles can be applied as guidelines from which to implement a healthful macronutrient ratio. 

The Nutritional Therapy Association recommends 40% carbohydrate, 30% fat, and 30% protein.

Before you get carried away, let's look at what these micronutrients actually are.

By "carbohydrates", I mean mostly vegetables and fruits instead of starchy carbs. 

Cabbage, tomatoes, apples, celery, green beans, lettuce, broccoli, cauliflower, cucumber, eggplant, berries, zucchini, spinach, kale, chard, and collards — these and other fruits and vegetables are non-starchy carbs. 

Starchy carbs include potatoes and root vegetables, beans, and grains.

For weight loss, refined carbs should be avoided altogether. These include white bread, pizza, bagels, pasta, cookies, cake, candy, white sugar, refined cereals, muffins, soda, potato chips, and packaged foods containing white flour and/or white sugar.

Fats that help you to lose weight include lard (from forested pigs like the ones we raise at Polyface), butter or ghee (from 100% grass-fed cows), chicken schmaltz (from pastured chickens), beef tallow (from 100% grass-fed beeves), duck fat, lamb fat (from 100% grass-fed lamb), olive oil, and coconut oil. Coconut oil is a special case (I’ll dedicate another blog to extoll the virtues of raw coconut oil).

A few oils to stay clear of include bottled nut oils or avocado oil. They are extremely fragile and turn rancid almost immediately upon exposure to air. 

Processors deodorize these oils to remove the unpleasant smell and taste of rancidity. Nut oils and avocado oil are nutritious if you obtain the oil by consuming the nuts and avocados themselves. The oil is protected inside the nuts and fruit and can be ingested before it has a chance to become rancid.

Also avoid corn, cottonseed, soy, and canola oils, even if they’re designated 'organic'. These polyunsaturated industrially processed oils are unhealthful for many reasons that cannot be covered in a short blog post. 

They are found in commercial salad dressings, soups, sauces, gravy, butter substitutes (margarine, spreads), mayonnaise, chips, crackers, breads, etc. You will find a few exceptions, such as chips that are fried in lard, and breads containing butter or olive oil instead of soy or canola. This is when reductionist shopping (i.e., reading labels) is required.

Butter is delicious on almost anything. And, if it’s from 100% grass-fed cows, it won’t burn when you cook with it like conventional butter does. 

Greens sautéed in butter, dressed with lemon juice and liquid aminos, make a nutritious side dish for a meal. 

The calcium in the greens  requires the presence of fat and acid in order to release and assimilate it. 

Another delicious combination that achieves this goal is greens sautéed in bacon fat and dressed with a splash of raw apple cider vinegar. Next time you fry some Polyface bacon, simply save the fat by pouring it into a small bowl or jar. The sediment will sink to the bottom, and you'll be left with a beautiful cooking oil for eggs or veggies. Store it in your fridge and use it up.

Saturated animal fats from properly raised animals will help you shed extra pounds that come from consuming excess carbohydrates and proteins. 

So consume the healthy ones and eliminate the unhealthy ones, and you’ll easily lose any excess that you might be carrying around. As your body finds its healthy balance, you'll notice other changes, too.

You’ll notice changes in immune function, hormone synthesis, and insulin metabolism. Good-bye diabetes, infertility, and allergies. 

May you be deeply nourished!

Susan

More from the blog

Duplication

  "How does this scale?"  Whenever someone asks me that question, the underlying assumption is that production volume requires consolidation, concentration, and centralization.           In other words, the only way to feed the world is to make bigger chicken houses in one place, bigger canneries in one place, bigger machines and bigger warehouses.  I remember well being vilified by a Smithsonian historian at a food conference where he and I were both on a panel.                     When I dared to suggest bigger is not always better, he interrupted me and ranted for 10 minutes on why bigger is always better.  "A bigger fort was always bigger than a smaller one.  A bigger gun was always better than a smaller one."  He went on and on about how historical accuracy and authenticity demands addiction to bigger.                   But biology is not forts and guns.  It's not mechanical.  Critters have an optimal size.  As animal behaviorist guru Temple Grandin says, living things demand energy for three things:  reproduction, growth, and immunological function.  All three must be in balance.  When anyone selects for only one of those traits, the other two suffer.  That's why American dairy cows only have two lactations on average.  When they milk as heavily as our one-trait genetic selection asks, they don't breed and have all sorts of sickness problems.                   Nature does not scale through concentration; it scales with duplication.  If nature wants more oak, it doesn't make one big tree; it makes acorns.  If nature wants more milk, it doesn't make a great big cow; it makes calves.  If nature wants more tomatoes, it doesn't make a monster tomato plant; it makes a bunch of seeds that make more tomato plants.  Nature scales with duplication.                   At Polyface, rather than having a chicken house big enough for 15,000 chickens, we have 170 little 120 square foot portable shelters holding 75 birds apiece and giving us cumulative capacity for 15,000.  But they're spread out in modules, duplicated, to give us the production volume.                   We run pigs in groupings of 35-50.  A Smithfield confinement facility might house 5,000 hogs in a bigger-than-football-field-sized facility.  The stench is unbearable.  By spreading these pigs out across the landscape in small groups we get the same scale without any of the ecological, immunological, or animal welfare dysfunction.                   This could even be said of farming in general.  People see the massive corn, soybean, and alfalfa farms in the mid-west and wonder how we would possibly survive without those massive, single-species outfits.  The fact is they aren't even producing food.  Half the soybeans are exported to other countries; those markets are drying up rapidly with competition from other countries like Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil.  Nearly half the corn goes to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol.  The alfalfa goes to Japan and Saudi Arabia to feed racehorses.  By and large, all that production isn't even food.                   The fact is we don't need to produce all those commodities and even if we needed it all for food, we could do it in a more spread out, diversified platform.  America has 35 million acres in lawns.  We have 36 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses.  All of this could be turned into duplicative production, like acorns for oak trees.                   My point is this:  scale as commonly understood in modern American lexicon is completely anti-ecological.  The real mechanism for scale is duplication.  A more democratized production creating volume through multiplicative nodes is the way nature works.  This is why farms like Polyface, with spread out infrastructure in repeated modules offers multiple advantages.                   Polyface can't feed the world by itself, and we have no desire to build an empire trying to.  But thousands of Polyfaces can feed the world.  Indeed, they're the only way to do it for the next 500 years.  This is one reason why we invest heavily in germinating new young farmers. Our stewardship and apprenticeship programs are all about this kind of duplication.                   In fact, Aug. 21-22 we're hosting the Stockman Grass Farmer's Launching Young Farmers conference where we'll feature 8 of our graduates who were 20 years old, no money, no land, and at 40 are full-time farming without government subsidies.  If you ever dreamed of bootstrapping a farming career, you should come.  We still have room.  It will be the most profound agricultural conference in America this year.  Information is on our website on the education tab.                   For most of you, the fact that you keep us in business to duplicate production and the farmers who will carry these principles forward, indicates your heart investing in an authentic food and farming model.  Thank you for making it all possible.