Which cattle-breed is best?

written by

Joel Salatin

posted on

December 12, 2023

Many people wonder what kind of cattle breeds we use for our beef. A quick answer is “anything but black.” That’s not totally true, but it does speak to our goal. No single breed carries all the desirable and perfect characteristics.

If only one breed were the answer, how could we have diversity? The numerous breeds around the world often carry geographic identifiers because certain characteristics allow health and vigor in certain environments. Scottish Highlander cattle, for example, do great in the Scottish Highlands, but they’re insufferably hot and stressed in Alabama.

Breeds generally grew out of geographical and climatic adaptation. At Polyface, we are far more interested in phenotypes and adaptation to our region than we are about color and breed distinctives. In general, we want wide bodied animals, short-legged, stocky, and small-framed. That is exactly the opposite of what the industry wants because what drives genetics in the cattle industry is fabrication efficiency. If you’re going to cut rib-eye steaks, getting an extra two per carcass is more efficient from a throughput standpoint.

The large size and heavy frames of modern cattle are ideal for corn feeding, staying above manure in a feedlot, and efficient processing. These are the opposite characteristics that we want in a grass-finished animal. More difference exists within breeds than from breed to breed. In other words, within Herefords are both large and small frames. Within Shorthorns are both large and small frames. Within any breed, some are more efficient converters of forage into meat, or heat tolerance in the summer, easy calving, and docility.

The single most important trait we look for at Polyface is longevity. The ones who last the longest are the ones most adapted, least stressed, and most economical in our system, in our climate, in our area. The animal that wins for us may not look like the animal that wins in Zimbabwe. But different regions demand different adaptations. In the end, we don’t care much about color; we care about health. Performance beats pedigree every time.

When you look at our cattle in the field, you’ll see red ones, grey ones, brown ones, and an occasional black one—goodness, it looks like Heinz 57 out there. But the goal is homogeneity of performance, not color or size or muzzle whiskers. We’re looking for a slick, well-fleshed, easy-keeping animal with a gentle disposition and enough brains to select the best grasses for her health. That beef, in turn, will give us the best eating and nutritional experience. Enjoy.

Joel Salatin

Polyface Farm

More from the blog

Duplication

  "How does this scale?"  Whenever someone asks me that question, the underlying assumption is that production volume requires consolidation, concentration, and centralization.           In other words, the only way to feed the world is to make bigger chicken houses in one place, bigger canneries in one place, bigger machines and bigger warehouses.  I remember well being vilified by a Smithsonian historian at a food conference where he and I were both on a panel.                     When I dared to suggest bigger is not always better, he interrupted me and ranted for 10 minutes on why bigger is always better.  "A bigger fort was always bigger than a smaller one.  A bigger gun was always better than a smaller one."  He went on and on about how historical accuracy and authenticity demands addiction to bigger.                   But biology is not forts and guns.  It's not mechanical.  Critters have an optimal size.  As animal behaviorist guru Temple Grandin says, living things demand energy for three things:  reproduction, growth, and immunological function.  All three must be in balance.  When anyone selects for only one of those traits, the other two suffer.  That's why American dairy cows only have two lactations on average.  When they milk as heavily as our one-trait genetic selection asks, they don't breed and have all sorts of sickness problems.                   Nature does not scale through concentration; it scales with duplication.  If nature wants more oak, it doesn't make one big tree; it makes acorns.  If nature wants more milk, it doesn't make a great big cow; it makes calves.  If nature wants more tomatoes, it doesn't make a monster tomato plant; it makes a bunch of seeds that make more tomato plants.  Nature scales with duplication.                   At Polyface, rather than having a chicken house big enough for 15,000 chickens, we have 170 little 120 square foot portable shelters holding 75 birds apiece and giving us cumulative capacity for 15,000.  But they're spread out in modules, duplicated, to give us the production volume.                   We run pigs in groupings of 35-50.  A Smithfield confinement facility might house 5,000 hogs in a bigger-than-football-field-sized facility.  The stench is unbearable.  By spreading these pigs out across the landscape in small groups we get the same scale without any of the ecological, immunological, or animal welfare dysfunction.                   This could even be said of farming in general.  People see the massive corn, soybean, and alfalfa farms in the mid-west and wonder how we would possibly survive without those massive, single-species outfits.  The fact is they aren't even producing food.  Half the soybeans are exported to other countries; those markets are drying up rapidly with competition from other countries like Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil.  Nearly half the corn goes to taxpayer-subsidized ethanol.  The alfalfa goes to Japan and Saudi Arabia to feed racehorses.  By and large, all that production isn't even food.                   The fact is we don't need to produce all those commodities and even if we needed it all for food, we could do it in a more spread out, diversified platform.  America has 35 million acres in lawns.  We have 36 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses.  All of this could be turned into duplicative production, like acorns for oak trees.                   My point is this:  scale as commonly understood in modern American lexicon is completely anti-ecological.  The real mechanism for scale is duplication.  A more democratized production creating volume through multiplicative nodes is the way nature works.  This is why farms like Polyface, with spread out infrastructure in repeated modules offers multiple advantages.                   Polyface can't feed the world by itself, and we have no desire to build an empire trying to.  But thousands of Polyfaces can feed the world.  Indeed, they're the only way to do it for the next 500 years.  This is one reason why we invest heavily in germinating new young farmers. Our stewardship and apprenticeship programs are all about this kind of duplication.                   In fact, Aug. 21-22 we're hosting the Stockman Grass Farmer's Launching Young Farmers conference where we'll feature 8 of our graduates who were 20 years old, no money, no land, and at 40 are full-time farming without government subsidies.  If you ever dreamed of bootstrapping a farming career, you should come.  We still have room.  It will be the most profound agricultural conference in America this year.  Information is on our website on the education tab.                   For most of you, the fact that you keep us in business to duplicate production and the farmers who will carry these principles forward, indicates your heart investing in an authentic food and farming model.  Thank you for making it all possible.